EARLY ENOUGH
The floor and mechanical concept are still open
The team can coordinate build-up, finishes, equipment, air distribution, controls, and trade sequencing.
[ START WITH THE PROJECT ]
Use cases for the decisions that happen before a waterless radiant project.
Choose the condition closest to your project, then review the required inputs, capabilities, evidence, responsibility boundaries, and next decision gate.
[ ICP FIT ]
The strongest projects share three signals.
Use cases are designed to screen for project readiness before a visitor reaches commercial scope.
DELIVERY OWNER
A qualified local HVAC party is involved
Refrigerant work, commissioning, troubleshooting, handoff, and service have a credible local owner.
EVIDENCE-LED
The buyer accepts project-specific review
Loads, local requirements, equipment, controls, evidence, and responsibilities will be resolved before commitment.
[ START WITH THE JOB ]
Select the job the project team needs to complete.
Each page connects the problem to project inputs, target workflow, capabilities, industry context, objections, evidence, and a contextual review CTA.
Custom-home planning
Plan a Cold-Climate All-Electric Custom Home
Coordinate radiant winter heat, air-side cooling, loads, electrical capacity, controls, floor assemblies, and service before the mechanical concept is fixed.
Review workflow →Partner onboardingQualify a First Waterless Radiant Partner Project
Turn contractor interest into a documented project review with clear inputs, responsibilities, hold points, commissioning, service, and expansion criteria.
Review workflow →Renovation planningEvaluate a Whole-Floor Renovation
Determine whether an open floor assembly, build-up allowance, project schedule, HVAC team, and service plan make a renovation suitable for waterless radiant.
Review workflow →Design coordinationRun an Early Builder & Architect Design Review
Put radiant heating, floor build-up, air-side cooling, controls, equipment space, trades, evidence, and service ownership on one design agenda.
Review workflow →[ BUYER JOURNEY ]
Move from curiosity to a qualified project.
The content journey should answer different questions at each stage instead of repeating the same product description.
01
Problem recognition
Can we get radiant comfort without designing a hydronic floor loop?
02
Solution exploration
Could this work in our building, climate, floor assembly, and mechanical concept?
03
Capability validation
How are heating, cooling, controls, circuits, installation, and service handled?
04
Evidence review
What is documented, what is overseas reference material, and what remains project-specific?
05
Project decision
Who owns the next design, site, commissioning, and commercial steps?
06
Use and expansion
What did the first project teach us about design, installation, service, and local demand?
[ EVIDENCE NEEDED ]
Bring evidence that matches the stage.
Early visitors need clear architecture; project teams need detailed inputs, responsibility, testing, commissioning, and service evidence.
Architecture diagrams
Explain refrigerant-direct radiant heating, air-side cooling, optional hot water, and controls without category confusion.
Project input checklist
Location, plans, loads, floor assemblies, cooling, electrical, project team, schedule, local requirements, and service.
Responsibility matrix
Assign design, procurement, trades, testing, commissioning, documentation, warranty coordination, and service.
Reference limits
Label overseas references clearly and avoid turning project scale into an unsupported outcome claim.
Does one of these use cases match your project?
Share the building type, region, design stage, floor scope, HVAC team, timing, and current decision point. HT will review fit before proposing a next step.
Review Your Project